Talk:CLI Reference - Revision history

Heeheehee: /* Remark */ provided link

2011-04-03T21:19:54Z

Remark: provided link

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:19, 3 April 2011
Line 29:		Line 29:

	While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seems that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with // [[User:Stanley\|Stanley]] 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)		While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seems that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with // [[User:Stanley\|Stanley]] 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
			:: [[Comments\|Seriously? (this is a link. Click it!)]] --[[User:Heeheehee\|Heeheehee]] 21:19, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Stanley: /* Remark */

2011-04-03T14:29:55Z

Remark

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:29, 3 April 2011
Line 28:		Line 28:
	==Remark==		==Remark==

	While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it ~~seem~~ that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with // [[User:Stanley\|Stanley]] 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)		While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seems that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with // [[User:Stanley\|Stanley]] 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Stanley: /* Remark */

2011-04-03T14:28:49Z

Remark

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 3 April 2011
Line 28:		Line 28:
	==Remark==		==Remark==

	While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seem that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with //		While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seem that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with // [[User:Stanley\|Stanley]] 14:28, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Stanley at 14:28, 3 April 2011

2011-04-03T14:28:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 3 April 2011
Line 25:		Line 25:

	Ugh, what a mess. Sometimes, <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> results in a <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tag or something inside of wiki tables. On the other hand, similar FUBARS happen when using <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> ''outside'' of tables on a wiki. Long story short; inside of a table, use <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> for <nowiki>\|</nowiki> and outside of a table use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. Messy enough for you? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)		Ugh, what a mess. Sometimes, <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> results in a <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tag or something inside of wiki tables. On the other hand, similar FUBARS happen when using <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> ''outside'' of tables on a wiki. Long story short; inside of a table, use <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> for <nowiki>\|</nowiki> and outside of a table use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. Messy enough for you? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

			==Remark==

			While used intrinsically in the ASH examples, it seem that nowhere is it stated explicitly that to remark a line in either a CLI or ASH script to preface it with //

Bale at 20:37, 15 July 2010

2010-07-15T20:37:32Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:37, 15 July 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:

	Bale recently explained a limitation with the acquire command that I was previously unaware of in [http://kolmafia.us/showthread.php?4575 this thread]. Perhaps acquire needs it's own page to account for this information? --[[User:That FN Ninja\|That FN Ninja]] 16:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)		Bale recently explained a limitation with the acquire command that I was previously unaware of in [http://kolmafia.us/showthread.php?4575 this thread]. Perhaps acquire needs it's own page to account for this information? --[[User:That FN Ninja\|That FN Ninja]] 16:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

			* This is not a CLI issue. The exact same issue affects {{f\|retrieve_item}}. It should probably be mentioned on that page. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 20:37, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

	==FYI==		==FYI==

That FN Ninja at 16:10, 15 July 2010

2010-07-15T16:10:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:10, 15 July 2010
Line 15:		Line 15:

	: My thought is that you've covered everything perfectly. This should be our bible for CLI pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 03:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		: My thought is that you've covered everything perfectly. This should be our bible for CLI pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 03:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			Bale recently explained a limitation with the acquire command that I was previously unaware of in [http://kolmafia.us/showthread.php?4575 this thread]. Perhaps acquire needs it's own page to account for this information? --[[User:That FN Ninja\|That FN Ninja]] 16:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

	==FYI==		==FYI==

StDoodle: /* FYI */

2010-05-02T04:00:35Z

FYI

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:00, 2 May 2010
Line 19:		Line 19:
	You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

	Ugh, what a mess. Sometimes, <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> results in a <nowiki><pre></nowiki> inside of wiki tables. On the other hand, similar FUBARS happen when using <nowiki>\|</nowiki> ''outside'' of tables on a wiki. Long story short; inside of a table, use <nowiki>\|</nowiki> for <nowiki>\|</nowiki> and outside of a table use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. Messy enough for you? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)		Ugh, what a mess. Sometimes, <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> results in a <nowiki><pre></nowiki> tag or something inside of wiki tables. On the other hand, similar FUBARS happen when using <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> ''outside'' of tables on a wiki. Long story short; inside of a table, use <nowiki>&#124;</nowiki> for <nowiki>\|</nowiki> and outside of a table use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. Messy enough for you? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

StDoodle: /* FYI */

2010-05-02T03:59:30Z

FYI

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:59, 2 May 2010
Line 18:		Line 18:

	You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			Ugh, what a mess. Sometimes, <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> results in a <nowiki><pre></nowiki> inside of wiki tables. On the other hand, similar FUBARS happen when using <nowiki>\|</nowiki> ''outside'' of tables on a wiki. Long story short; inside of a table, use <nowiki>\|</nowiki> for <nowiki>\|</nowiki> and outside of a table use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki>. Messy enough for you? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:59, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Bale: Perfect answer.

2010-04-22T03:38:22Z

Perfect answer.

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:38, 22 April 2010
Line 14:		Line 14:
	All additional thoughts on this are welcome. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		All additional thoughts on this are welcome. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			: My thought is that you've covered everything perfectly. This should be our bible for CLI pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 03:38, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
	==FYI==		==FYI==

	You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

StDoodle at 03:26, 22 April 2010

2010-04-22T03:26:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:26, 22 April 2010
Line 13:		Line 13:

	All additional thoughts on this are welcome. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)		All additional thoughts on this are welcome. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

			==FYI==

			You can't simply copypasta stuff into these wiki tables; remember, the pipe character (<nowiki>\|</nowiki>) is treated special in templates! Use <nowiki>{{!}}</nowiki> instead, or <nowiki><nowiki></nowiki>''Stuff''<nowiki></</nowiki><nowiki>nowiki></nowiki> tags. (P.S. You should see the source for this fyi...) This, by the way, is the reason a lot of parameter options appear to be missing. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 03:26, 22 April 2010 (UTC)