Talk:Storage amount - Revision history

Bale: Tips, Tricks and Workarounds

2010-09-23T21:18:25Z

Tips, Tricks and Workarounds

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:18, 23 September 2010
Line 10:		Line 10:

	*Actually it doesn't sound perfect, which is why I'm not making it yet... hrmph.		*Actually it doesn't sound perfect, which is why I'm not making it yet... hrmph.

			Moving Discussion to [[Talk: Tips, Tricks and Workarounds]]. Since there may be a bit of discussion about the page before it gets created properly. We can always move the talk page if we change our minds about what it should be called. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 21:18, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

StDoodle at 17:05, 23 September 2010

2010-09-23T17:05:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:05, 23 September 2010
Line 7:		Line 7:
	I favor a caveats page. Or perhaps we could call it Tricks & Tips. We should add [[User:PhilmASTErpLus#ASH_Quirks_and_Hacks\|THIS]] there also. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		I favor a caveats page. Or perhaps we could call it Tricks & Tips. We should add [[User:PhilmASTErpLus#ASH_Quirks_and_Hacks\|THIS]] there also. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

	Tips, Tricks and Workarounds sounds good to me. I agree that those items philmaterplus points out should go there. Also, we should clean up the FAQ to only include one example of non-aborting booleans, and move the full list to this new page, I think (with a link of course). Perhaps this would even be a good page to put a dedicated file link to the syntax highlighting scheme for Notepadd++ (I favor having it on the wiki, so when it's updated with new ash functions, it's... you know, updated). I'll come up with other ideas, too, and leave them on the talk page when it's there. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 17:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)		Tips, Tricks and Workarounds* sounds good to me. I agree that those items philmaterplus points out should go there. Also, we should clean up the FAQ to only include one example of non-aborting booleans, and move the full list to this new page, I think (with a link of course). Perhaps this would even be a good page to put a dedicated file link to the syntax highlighting scheme for Notepadd++ (I favor having it on the wiki, so when it's updated with new ash functions, it's... you know, updated). I'll come up with other ideas, too, and leave them on the talk page when it's there. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 17:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

			*Actually it doesn't sound perfect, which is why I'm not making it yet... hrmph.

StDoodle at 17:04, 23 September 2010

2010-09-23T17:04:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 23 September 2010
Line 6:		Line 6:

	I favor a caveats page. Or perhaps we could call it Tricks & Tips. We should add [[User:PhilmASTErpLus#ASH_Quirks_and_Hacks\|THIS]] there also. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		I favor a caveats page. Or perhaps we could call it Tricks & Tips. We should add [[User:PhilmASTErpLus#ASH_Quirks_and_Hacks\|THIS]] there also. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

			Tips, Tricks and Workarounds sounds good to me. I agree that those items philmaterplus points out should go there. Also, we should clean up the FAQ to only include one example of non-aborting booleans, and move the full list to this new page, I think (with a link of course). Perhaps this would even be a good page to put a dedicated file link to the syntax highlighting scheme for Notepadd++ (I favor having it on the wiki, so when it's updated with new ash functions, it's... you know, updated). I'll come up with other ideas, too, and leave them on the talk page when it's there. --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 17:04, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Bale: ASH Tips & Tricks

2010-09-22T22:22:15Z

ASH Tips & Tricks

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:22, 22 September 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Perhaps we should start a special "caveats" page, and link to subheadings on it, for such info; it seems a bit much may be required to explain the situation to include it on every page. It would also be a good place to put info on things like Between Battle Scripts and adventure count in automation, etc. Thoughts? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 15:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		Perhaps we should start a special "caveats" page, and link to subheadings on it, for such info; it seems a bit much may be required to explain the situation to include it on every page. It would also be a good place to put info on things like Between Battle Scripts and adventure count in automation, etc. Thoughts? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 15:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

			I favor a caveats page. Or perhaps we could call it Tricks & Tips. We should add [[User:PhilmASTErpLus#ASH_Quirks_and_Hacks\|THIS]] there also. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 22:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

StDoodle at 15:10, 22 September 2010

2010-09-22T15:10:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:10, 22 September 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Verified. I believe that this was reported as a bug once. (Back when we had that awesome bug tracker.) However this behavior was clarified to be working as intended and hence, not a bug. The fact that an itemd doesn't require a pulls means that it is supposed to be treated differently. Use {{f\|available_amount}} minus {{f\|item_amount}} to verify presence of free pulls in Hangks. Then get them into inventory with {{f\|retrieve_item}} instead of with {{f\|take_storage}}. You're right that info should probably be on all relevant pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)		Verified. I believe that this was reported as a bug once. (Back when we had that awesome bug tracker.) However this behavior was clarified to be working as intended and hence, not a bug. The fact that an itemd doesn't require a pulls means that it is supposed to be treated differently. Use {{f\|available_amount}} minus {{f\|item_amount}} to verify presence of free pulls in Hangks. Then get them into inventory with {{f\|retrieve_item}} instead of with {{f\|take_storage}}. You're right that info should probably be on all relevant pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

			Perhaps we should start a special "caveats" page, and link to subheadings on it, for such info; it seems a bit much may be required to explain the situation to include it on every page. It would also be a good place to put info on things like Between Battle Scripts and adventure count in automation, etc. Thoughts? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 15:10, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Bale: Not a bug. Strangely.

2010-09-22T05:17:01Z

Not a bug. Strangely.

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:17, 22 September 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)		Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

			Verified. I believe that this was reported as a bug once. (Back when we had that awesome bug tracker.) However this behavior was clarified to be working as intended and hence, not a bug. The fact that an itemd doesn't require a pulls means that it is supposed to be treated differently. Use {{f\|available_amount}} minus {{f\|item_amount}} to verify presence of free pulls in Hangks. Then get them into inventory with {{f\|retrieve_item}} instead of with {{f\|take_storage}}. You're right that info should probably be on all relevant pages. --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

StDoodle: Created page with 'Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --~~~~'

2010-09-21T11:45:54Z

Created page with 'Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --~~~~'

New page

Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)