Talk:Whatif - Revision history

StDoodle at 15:02, 16 April 2010

2010-04-16T15:02:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:02, 16 April 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:This issue has bothered me actually. Perhaps it would be best if there was no (CLI) in the titles of any pages for the same reason that we don't want () appended to the titles of the ASH commands. The searching issue. Instead, what we need is something like setting it up to put (CLI) after the page title on the page, but not as part of the page's name, just like we currently have () for ash commands. StDoodle? --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 06:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)		:This issue has bothered me actually. Perhaps it would be best if there was no (CLI) in the titles of any pages for the same reason that we don't want () appended to the titles of the ASH commands. The searching issue. Instead, what we need is something like setting it up to put (CLI) after the page title on the page, but not as part of the page's name, just like we currently have () for ash commands. StDoodle? --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 06:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

			The wiki standard on putting stuff in parentheses is that you try to avoid it unless you would otherwise need multiple pages with the same name, in which case it's useful as disambiguation. My thought with [[Ash (CLI)]] was that at some point a page title "Ash" or "ASH" might be desired for those who are familiar with the rest of KoLmafia. Such a page would be the main thing you'd think of as "What is ASH," and would probably be a brief intro to the language.

			But yeah, it's a tough call... what it mostly comes down to is how many page collisions we can expect to have. I'm guessing not many, as I don't think we need to devote a page to every CLI command as we do for every ASH function, but I'm not entirely sure about that approach. I really need some help deciding how to handle the whole CLI reference part of this wiki... anyone have any ideas? --[[User:StDoodle\|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 15:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Bale at 06:15, 16 April 2010

2010-04-16T06:15:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:15, 16 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the [[Ash (CLI)]] page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --[[User:Heeheehee\|Heeheehee]] 05:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)		Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the [[Ash (CLI)]] page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --[[User:Heeheehee\|Heeheehee]] 05:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

			:This issue has bothered me actually. Perhaps it would be best if there was no (CLI) in the titles of any pages for the same reason that we don't want () appended to the titles of the ASH commands. The searching issue. Instead, what we need is something like setting it up to put (CLI) after the page title on the page, but not as part of the page's name, just like we currently have () for ash commands. StDoodle? --[[User:Bale\|Bale]] 06:15, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Heeheehee at 05:02, 16 April 2010

2010-04-16T05:02:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:02, 16 April 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the [[~~ASH~~ (CLI)]] page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --[[User:Heeheehee\|Heeheehee]] 05:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)		Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the [[Ash (CLI)]] page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --[[User:Heeheehee\|Heeheehee]] 05:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Heeheehee: Created page with 'Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the ASH (CLI) page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --~~~~'

2010-04-16T05:01:23Z

Created page with 'Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the ASH (CLI) page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --~~~~'

New page

Should we append "(CLI)" to the title of this page, if only to be consistent with the [[ASH (CLI)]] page? (Tiny nitpick, I know) --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 05:01, 16 April 2010 (UTC)