Talk:Comments: Difference between revisions

From Kolmafia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>StDoodle
Created page with 'A chunk's missing here... I don't have time to dive into what the reasoning would be behind various edits at the moment, so if someone who's followed the page history could doubl…'
 
imported>Bale
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
A chunk's missing here... I don't have time to dive into what the reasoning would be behind various edits at the moment, so if someone who's followed the page history could double check I'd appreciate it. --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 08:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
A chunk's missing here... I don't have time to dive into what the reasoning would be behind various edits at the moment, so if someone who's followed the page history could double check I'd appreciate it. --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 08:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
I just looked over each edit and nothing was removed from the page, except for obsolete information about the problem with using /* */ on a line with other code. Whatever you believe to be missing was never written. --[[User:Bale|Bale]] 09:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Ha, here's what happened; I saw a phantom <nowiki>|</nowiki> on the page, and assumed it cropped up from an incomplete edit of a template call. Actually, what happened was apparently you added it between categories. This isn't necessary, as wikis handle putting a pipe between multiple categories automagically, so the extra pipe was printed to the screen above. :P --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 06:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
*Ah. Thanks for catching that. --[[User:Bale|Bale]] 06:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 06:55, 24 May 2010

A chunk's missing here... I don't have time to dive into what the reasoning would be behind various edits at the moment, so if someone who's followed the page history could double check I'd appreciate it. --StDoodle (#1059825) 08:56, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

I just looked over each edit and nothing was removed from the page, except for obsolete information about the problem with using /* */ on a line with other code. Whatever you believe to be missing was never written. --Bale 09:03, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Ha, here's what happened; I saw a phantom | on the page, and assumed it cropped up from an incomplete edit of a template call. Actually, what happened was apparently you added it between categories. This isn't necessary, as wikis handle putting a pipe between multiple categories automagically, so the extra pipe was printed to the screen above. :P --StDoodle (#1059825) 06:52, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

  • Ah. Thanks for catching that. --Bale 06:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)