Template talk:Testwiki: Difference between revisions
imported>StDoodle No edit summary |
imported>Heeheehee mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Um, guys, you do realize this is a test template I created, not the actual kolwiki template Bale made, right? I tried a whole slew of stuff with this test page (mostly just on preview, very little was saved). Then I gave up; there just doesn't seem to be a good "all-around" solution to the heading-link issue. Except, probably, having the kolwiki officially registered as an interwiki by fewyn. --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 18:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | Um, guys, you do realize this is a test template I created, not the actual kolwiki template Bale made, right? I tried a whole slew of stuff with this test page (mostly just on preview, very little was saved). Then I gave up; there just doesn't seem to be a good "all-around" solution to the heading-link issue. Except, probably, having the kolwiki officially registered as an interwiki by fewyn. --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 18:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
: Yeah, just one thing -- preview uses the '''current''' version of the template, as opposed to the one that you're working with. I'm guessing this is somewhat related to why I had to resave pages to get the template to update. --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 18:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
: We know. We're just commenting on it. And that preview problem Heeheehee refers to was extremely annoying. :( --[[User:Bale|Bale]] 04:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:: All right, that's really weird. The problem goes away if I remove PAGENAMEE (i.e. basically revert all of the testing changes I made). Wonder if other "magic words" would avoid breaking nonsense like this. (More tests!) --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 00:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
:: All right, I guess that's good enough. Third parameter's for the anchor, which'll need to be prefixed by a '''#''' and be already <nowiki>{{ANCHORENCODE}}</nowiki>'d. Like... {{testwiki|Bad Moon|this here link|#{{ANCHORENCODE:Special Adventures}}}}. It's ugly, sure, but it could be worse. Will tinker around with it some more in the meanwhile. --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 01:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 01:45, 30 July 2010
Ehh. You do know the reason why I added the PAGENAMEE was because of pages with spaces in their names? Like dry noodles (well, I suppose you could get around that by using underscores, but that makes the resultant link look funny: dry_noodles.) --Heeheehee 13:51, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Also, some pages with special characters need special treatment. That's why I was using localurl, but PAGENAMEE is superior. I just didn't know about PAGENAMEE. Kudos to Heeheehee for that. --Bale 21:32, 26 July 2010 (UTC)
Um, guys, you do realize this is a test template I created, not the actual kolwiki template Bale made, right? I tried a whole slew of stuff with this test page (mostly just on preview, very little was saved). Then I gave up; there just doesn't seem to be a good "all-around" solution to the heading-link issue. Except, probably, having the kolwiki officially registered as an interwiki by fewyn. --StDoodle (#1059825) 18:36, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, just one thing -- preview uses the current version of the template, as opposed to the one that you're working with. I'm guessing this is somewhat related to why I had to resave pages to get the template to update. --Heeheehee 18:41, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- We know. We're just commenting on it. And that preview problem Heeheehee refers to was extremely annoying. :( --Bale 04:28, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
- All right, that's really weird. The problem goes away if I remove PAGENAMEE (i.e. basically revert all of the testing changes I made). Wonder if other "magic words" would avoid breaking nonsense like this. (More tests!) --Heeheehee 00:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
- All right, I guess that's good enough. Third parameter's for the anchor, which'll need to be prefixed by a # and be already {{ANCHORENCODE}}'d. Like... this here link. It's ugly, sure, but it could be worse. Will tinker around with it some more in the meanwhile. --Heeheehee 01:45, 30 July 2010 (UTC)