Talk:Eatsilent: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Heeheehee mNo edit summary |
imported>StDoodle No edit summary |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
They both return false if you can't manage to consume the item. I tested that as well. (Didn't you get the memo?) --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 22:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | They both return false if you can't manage to consume the item. I tested that as well. (Didn't you get the memo?) --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 22:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Oh, no, I meant it's kinda odd that eatsilent works differently than eat & overdrink works differently than drink, in regards to the return value.--[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 23:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:58, 11 April 2010
When not logged in:
- > ash eatsilent(1,$item[knob mushroom])
- Since you are not in a Mysticality sign, you may not visit the restaurant.
- You need 1 more Knob mushroom to continue.
- Returned: false
This suggests that the function does, in fact, take into account whether the item is eaten or not.
Edit: Erm, forgot to sign it. Here: --Heeheehee 02:11, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Ok, I cheated; I copypasta'd for this & overdrink. :P It IS kinda odd that they work differently, though... --StDoodle (#1059825) 02:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
They both return false if you can't manage to consume the item. I tested that as well. (Didn't you get the memo?) --Heeheehee 22:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
Oh, no, I meant it's kinda odd that eatsilent works differently than eat & overdrink works differently than drink, in regards to the return value.--StDoodle (#1059825) 23:58, 11 April 2010 (UTC)