Talk:Storage amount: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StDoodle Created page with 'Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --~~~~' |
imported>Bale Not a bug. Strangely. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
Verified. I believe that this was reported as a bug once. (Back when we had that awesome bug tracker.) However this behavior was clarified to be working as intended and hence, not a bug. The fact that an itemd doesn't require a pulls means that it is supposed to be treated differently. Use {{f|available_amount}} minus {{f|item_amount}} to verify presence of free pulls in Hangks. Then get them into inventory with {{f|retrieve_item}} instead of with {{f|take_storage}}. You're right that info should probably be on all relevant pages. --[[User:Bale|Bale]] 05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:17, 22 September 2010
Can anyone else verify, before I edit it in, that this function doesn't work on free pulls? --StDoodle (#1059825) 11:45, 21 September 2010 (UTC)
Verified. I believe that this was reported as a bug once. (Back when we had that awesome bug tracker.) However this behavior was clarified to be working as intended and hence, not a bug. The fact that an itemd doesn't require a pulls means that it is supposed to be treated differently. Use available_amount() minus item_amount() to verify presence of free pulls in Hangks. Then get them into inventory with retrieve_item() instead of with take_storage(). You're right that info should probably be on all relevant pages. --Bale 05:17, 22 September 2010 (UTC)