Difference between revisions of "Talk:Have outfit"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StDoodle |
imported>Heeheehee m |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
As I believe was discussed in IRC, this function supposedly can check for custom outfits. If it really can't, and that's intentional, then yeah, the chefstaff part isn't an issue (at least currently). --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle]] 19:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | As I believe was discussed in IRC, this function supposedly can check for custom outfits. If it really can't, and that's intentional, then yeah, the chefstaff part isn't an issue (at least currently). --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle]] 19:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Pro tip: anything that implies that mafia has any knowledge about the components of a custom outfit is a lie. --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 19:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Does not check for Torso-having; character without torso got this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | > ash have_outfit("clockwork apparatus") | ||
| + | |||
| + | Returned: true --[[User:Heeheehee|Heeheehee]] 06:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 06:59, 10 March 2010
I know for a fact that exactly 0 outfits have chefstaves in them. Will check for torso in a bit on one of my alts without Torso permed. --Heeheehee 17:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
As I believe was discussed in IRC, this function supposedly can check for custom outfits. If it really can't, and that's intentional, then yeah, the chefstaff part isn't an issue (at least currently). --StDoodle 19:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Pro tip: anything that implies that mafia has any knowledge about the components of a custom outfit is a lie. --Jasonharper 19:19, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Does not check for Torso-having; character without torso got this:
> ash have_outfit("clockwork apparatus")
Returned: true --Heeheehee 06:59, 10 March 2010 (UTC)