Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jasonharper"

From Kolmafia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>StDoodle
(Created page with 'Thanks for the help you've been giving lately, it's greatly appreciated! Thought I'd check on something also; is it okay to quote or near-quote revision notes when I don't know …')
 
imported>Jasonharper
m
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Thanks! --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle]] 14:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 
Thanks! --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle]] 14:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 +
* As the revision notes are frequently the only documentation you're going to have for a new function, certainly they should be fair game for inclusion here.  I agree that attribution of such notes would just be clutter. --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 15:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:21, 5 March 2010

Thanks for the help you've been giving lately, it's greatly appreciated!

Thought I'd check on something also; is it okay to quote or near-quote revision notes when I don't know how a function works, as I did with batch_close()? Should I give credit, as I did on that page, or is it implicit that the ultimate source of information may be said logs? Whatever you & V are most comfortable with is fine by me, but if I can save the clutter of including such attributions on a page, it wouldn't hurt.

It would probably also be nice to have a prominently linked-to "Without these mafia devs we wouldn't be here" type of page, I'd think.

Any other thoughts / comments are appreciated.

Thanks! --StDoodle 14:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

  • As the revision notes are frequently the only documentation you're going to have for a new function, certainly they should be fair game for inclusion here. I agree that attribution of such notes would just be clutter. --Jasonharper 15:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)