Difference between revisions of "User talk:PhilmASTErpLus"

From Kolmafia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>PhilmASTErpLus
imported>StDoodle
Line 1: Line 1:
 
"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms.  "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 
"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms.  "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:Uh-huh. Sorry about that editing rampage, should I go and revert them? Or how about alternatives? --[[User:PhilmASTErpLus|PhilmASTErpLus]] 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 
:Uh-huh. Sorry about that editing rampage, should I go and revert them? Or how about alternatives? --[[User:PhilmASTErpLus|PhilmASTErpLus]] 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
 +
 +
I was not aware of this either; we'll need to see where that means we need to make changes. --[[User:StDoodle|StDoodle (#1059825)]] 05:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:07, 22 June 2010

"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms. "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --Jasonharper 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Uh-huh. Sorry about that editing rampage, should I go and revert them? Or how about alternatives? --PhilmASTErpLus 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

I was not aware of this either; we'll need to see where that means we need to make changes. --StDoodle (#1059825) 05:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)