User talk:PhilmASTErpLus: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Jasonharper m Created page with '"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms. "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which requ…' |
imported>PhilmASTErpLus No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms. "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | "aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms. "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --[[User:Jasonharper|Jasonharper]] 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
:Uh-huh. Sorry about that editing rampage, should I go and revert them? Or how about alternatives? --[[User:PhilmASTErpLus|PhilmASTErpLus]] 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:39, 22 June 2010
"aggregate" and "map" are NOT synonyms. "aggregate" is an abstract type; the three concrete implementations of that type are maps, arrays, and plural typed constants (which require a separate implementation because they need to be immutable). --Jasonharper 04:36, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
- Uh-huh. Sorry about that editing rampage, should I go and revert them? Or how about alternatives? --PhilmASTErpLus 04:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)