Difference between revisions of "Print"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>StDoodle |
imported>Heeheehee m (Info about cecho and colorecho.) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
see_also={{SeeAlso|logprint|print_html}}| | see_also={{SeeAlso|logprint|print_html}}| | ||
| − | cli_equiv=The CLI commands "fprint," "echo" and "fecho" have similar functionality, minus the color option.| | + | cli_equiv=The CLI commands "fprint," "echo" and "fecho" have similar functionality, minus the color option. However, "cecho" (also "colorecho") does have this option for color.| |
special= Using an invalid color name or code can cause odd colors to be chosen.| | special= Using an invalid color name or code can cause odd colors to be chosen.| | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{RFI|How does color selection work when the specified color name / entity is invalid?|Didn't print() used to echo on the Adventuring status line? Is the absence of such behavior intentional?}} | {{RFI|How does color selection work when the specified color name / entity is invalid?|Didn't print() used to echo on the Adventuring status line? Is the absence of such behavior intentional?}} | ||
Revision as of 07:11, 10 March 2010
needs(code_samples);
Function Syntax
void print(string message ,string color )
- message is the text to print
- color is an (optional) html color name or code
Print the specified text message to the CLI. If the optional color parameter is specified and a valid html color code or entity, it will print in that color.
CLI Equivalent
The CLI commands "fprint," "echo" and "fecho" have similar functionality, minus the color option. However, "cecho" (also "colorecho") does have this option for color.
See Also
Special
Using an invalid color name or code can cause odd colors to be chosen.
Attention KoLmafia Experts!
We need your help; some details of this function's operation are unknown or unclear.
The following specific questions have been raised:
- How does color selection work when the specified color name / entity is invalid?
- Didn't print() used to echo on the Adventuring status line? Is the absence of such behavior intentional?